태그 아카이브: 쓰기

동의하는 의견, Clarence Thomas 대법관은 법원에 '재고를 해야 한다.’ 동성 결혼 및 산아제한을 합법화하는 판결

동의하는 의견, Justice Clarence Thomas Writes Court 'Should Reconsider' Rulings Legalizing Gay Marriage and Birth Control

Conservative Justice Clarence Thomasopinion in the overturning of Roe v. Wade suggests other landmark rulings — including those that protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage — could be in peril.

Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion excerpted on Twitter, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold v. 코네티컷, Lawrence V. 텍사스, 그리고 오버게펠 v. 남자 이름 — the rulings that currently protect the right to buy and use contraceptives without government restriction, the right to a same-sex relationships, and the right to same-sex marriage.

From Thomasconcurring opinion: “… in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, 로렌스, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is ‘demonstrably erroneous,’ … we have a duty to ‘correct the errorestablished in those precedents…”

짐 오버게펠, one of the plaintiffs in the historic 오버게펠 v. 남자 이름 case, said in a statement sent to PEOPLE that Thomas isnot the Supreme Deity.

Clarence Thomas is a Supreme Court justice appointed by humans, he is not the Supreme Deity. The millions of loving couples who have the right to marriage equality to form their own families do not need Clarence Thomas imposing his individual twisted morality upon them. If you want to see an error in judgment, 클라렌스 토마스, look in the mirror.

Following a leaked draft opinion overturning 어란, lawmakers have hypothesized about the possibly of the court overturning other landmark rulings.

At a May fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee in Chicago, 대통령 조 바이든 said of the leaked opinion: “It’s not just the brutality of taking away a woman’s right to her bodybut it also, if you read the opinionbasically says there’s no such thing as the right to privacy.

Biden continued: “If that holdsmark my words: They are going to go after the Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage.

The decision to overturn 로브이. 걸어 건너기 was officially announced Friday, a month after a 98-page opinion 에 의해 얻어진 폴리티코 — allegedly authored by Justice Samuel Alito and leaked to the press in a major breach of confidentiality — stated that어란 was egregiously wrong from the start,” 그리고 그 “우리 [the Supreme Court majority] hold that 어란 그리고 케이시 [another ruling on the right to abortion from 1992 which upheld the previous court decision] must be overruled.

The draft document, labeled as theOpinion of the Court,” 도 말했다, “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.

The process of overturning 로브이. 걸어 건너기 began when Mississippi’s ban on abortions after 15 weeks was struck down by a federal court. The state then asked the Supreme Court to either overturn 로브이. 걸어 건너기 or allow states to pass pre-viability abortion bans. Oral arguments were heard in December.

Twelve states in the country, including Mississippi and Texas, 가지다 “trigger” 법률 in place that go into effect once 어란 is overturned. More states are likely to follow suit, as Elizabeth Nash, state policy analyst at the Guttmacher Institute, a research group focused on abortion rights, told PEOPLE earlier.

And that would make it very hard for a large percentage of women in the country to access abortion care in their own state. It means a lot more people would have to travel for care,” Nash said. “And the people who are most impacted by these abortion restrictions and bans are people of color, low-income individuals, young people and LGBTQ individuals — people who are already burdened with insufficient access to healthcare.

There are efforts to maintain the right to abortion in other states such as New York, 하와이, California and Washington, which have statutory protections for abortion rights in their laws.