A judge has denied Sara Palin‘s request for a new trial in her defamation case against Il New York Times, saying the former Alaska governor was “unable to deliver at trial admissible evidence that remotely supported her claim.”
Palin sued the Volte for defamation in 2017, after an editorial in the paper linked the 2011 shooting of Gabby Giffords to a map circulated by Palin’s political action group, which showed specific electoral districts under cross-hairs.
Il Volte piece initially stated there was a link between the map and the shooting, though the paper corrected that two days later, admitting no such link was established.
“We’re sorry about this and we appreciate that our readers called us on the mistake,” the paper said in a social media post.
On the stand at the trial, ex Volte editorial page editor James Bennet called the incident a “terrible mistake,” riportato dall'AP.
“We are human beings. We do make mistakes,” Bennet said, aggiungendo: “I’ve regretted it pretty much every day since. That’s on me. That’s my failure.”
Palin, nel frattempo, likened the case to a “David and Goliath” story — saying she had lost sleep over the editorial, which she claimed had damaged her career.
“It was devastating to read a false accusation that I had anything to do with murder,” Palin said during the trial, per earlier reporting by the Associated Press. “I felt powerless — that I was up against Goliath. The people were David. I was David.”
A febbraio, Federal Judge Jed S. Rakoff ruled that Palin failed to prove Il New York Times acted with “actual malice” when it falsely linked her political group to a 2011 mass shooting — meaning her potentially precedent-upending libel suit against the paper would be dismissed.
Martedì, Rakoff weighed in once more, saying the court denied “in full” her bid for a new trial.
Non perdere mai una storia: iscriviti a Newsletter giornaliera gratuita di PEOPLE per essere sempre aggiornato sul meglio di ciò che le PERSONE hanno da offrire, da succose notizie sulle celebrità a avvincenti storie di interesse umano.
“In a defamation case brought by a public figure like Sarah Palin, a mistake is not enough to win if it was not motivated by actual malice,” Judge Rakoff wrote in his opinion, rapporti della CNN. “And the striking thing about the trial here was that Palin, for all her earlier assertions, could not in the end introduce even a speck of such evidence.”